Marked as spam
I think it’s important for everyone to first agree on what good values are. Everyone has different opinions and as such everyone will have different ideas about a good leader.
By violently overthrowing the corruptible bourgeoisie and subsequently creating a bountiful socialist utopia based upon the equitable exchange of good & labour under the dictatorship of the proletariat.
Bolshe boy – do violence and dictatorship show good values according to you? They dont to me.
The best way is to first know their background before they are given offices
put strict laws and also teach them on what they are supposed to deliver
Who should decide the strict laws James and who should police them?
What i know that having good dictatorship we as community we can choose good leaders .
if everyone can be trained to be responsible and taught the dangers of corruptions then this means the leaders will be against corruption.
first the leaders should be taught the principles of a good leader after being elected into power because this will show them what they are supposed to do as leaders then meaning of corruption should be made known and what does it take for some to carryout corruption.
How do we ensure that these qualities/behaviours are monitored/continually demonstrated? Making sure our leaders are accountable for their behaviour & are provided feedback when need to improve/adjust how they’re behaving.
I should add to the above – we must make sure we do the above.
for someone to be elected as a leader should first have an experience of 5 years in leadership as this will help to find out if they have ever had cases of corruption.
The nation should establish anti corruption court, identify corrupt leaders and imprison them .
Before voting leaders in office, follow their biography from childhood,leadership positions held, investigate their strength and weaknesses when they were leaders in a particular working environment. Am sure when this is done, you will be able to know the quality of a leader you are recommending or voting into office.
Many nation-states do currently have anti-corruption institutions, but often this isn’t enough because many leaders feel as though their judgements are being watched and questioned. Is there a way of ensuring there is better communication between leaders and anti-corruption institutions so they can work together rather than enforce policies?
How do you assess if their leadership was any good Derrick? 5 years experience is useful but 5 years bad experience is useless.
Who gets to decide the policies about corruption? And who is corrupt ffree enough to police them?
Accountability is key, ordinary people being able to hold leaders to account
How can they do this Jo? When leaders have the army and police they are accountable only to god
Please log in to post questions.